Quote

Talking about Why George Bush cannot match Sonia Gandhi?wa=wsignin1.0

George W Bush finally had his revenge as he slept through the judicial murder of Saddam Hussein, who had famously celebrated with gunshots when Papa Bush's term as US president ended without securing the Iraqi strongman's ouster. Once Bush junior decided that all was fair in war, lies about WMDs included, Saddam stood no chance. He paid with his throne in 2003 and his neck three years later, hanged to death in the same manner he himself presided over so many executions during the quarter century he ruled Iraq, first as a darling of Washington and then as a resolute foe.

Had Kurds or Shias dragged out Saddam and done him to death, it could have been explained as an act of vengeance by communities whose members he tortured and killed. But even making allowances for the Internet age, they may not have filmed Saddam's execution for the world to see. Only those who humiliated a once proud Arab nation by capturing on movie a petty soldier examining Saddam's dentures could have thought of the ultimate insult.

That Saddam died without any visible expression of fear, refusing to don the death veil (even as all his executioners hid their identity by securely covering their faces with black masks), may only end up further tormenting a military whose occupation of Iraq is by all accounts coming to an inglorious end. And the fact that Saddam was put to death hours before Muslims celebrate Eid was the ultimate humiliation of a religious community that is today undergoing an unprecedented sense of persecution, both real and perceived.

Far away, in a country that is home to the world's second largest Islamic population but nevertheless overwhelmingly Hindu, there was widespread revulsion over Saddam's killing. It wasn't because the man on the street in India loved Saddam or his ways. But because people felt it was in poor taste to first have a man convicted with a court whose credibility was in doubt - and then film his last moments. How different were Saddam's executioners from those of Al Qaeda?

What has gone unnoticed is the resolve of one individual in India, completely unlike George Bush, to draw a clear line between a personal tragedy, a far more serious one at that, and the affairs of the state as well as the welfare of a people. Sonia Gandhi has acted like a statesman when it comes to Sri Lanka, not letting the assassination of her husband Rajiv Gandhi at the hands of a Tamil suicide bomber cloud her concern for the island's beleaguered Tamil community.

^TOP^

Quote

Be Afraid When...

Things to be afraid of when the doctor says 'em in the operation theatre with you lying on the bed

 

 

 

1) Will someone stop that thing from beating? That's throwing my concentration off.

2) HELL! Did anyone one see my Rolex? I just lost it while operating him.

3) You know, there's lot of money in kidneys and this guy has got two of 'em.

4) O the Great Lord of Darkness! Accept our sacrifice.

5) This would be an interesting experiment for all of us.

6) Now we will take out the subject's brain and place it in the body of this ape.

7) Nurse did this patient sign the Organ Donation Card?

8) Shit!! The page 24 of the "How to operate" manual is missing!!!!!

9) FIRE! FIRE! Everyone get out. Quick.

10) Save that. We'll need it for the autopsy.

 

Courtesy of Nishank

 

^TOP^

Clue no: 1 -  In an Historic match between India and   England, he served as a  captain.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Clue no: 2 -  He was the Opening bowler in that  match....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Clue no: 3 -  He was also the Opening batsman in  that match....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Clue no: 4 -  He is the one who bowled the last ball  of his
innings....
.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Clue no: 5 -  He was the one who faced the last ball  of the innings....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Still u didn't get it...... oops.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Clue no: 6 -  He took the last wicket of the  innings.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Clue no: 7 -  He was the man of match in that  particular match....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Okay atleast after this easy one

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Clue no: 8 -  He won the match for his team by  hitting a sixer in the last  ball........ Who is HE  .

.

.

.

.

.

Not yet
.

.

.

.

.

.

Okay Let the genius answer it....
.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

It is..........

Aamir Khan in Lagaan .

Put about 100 bricks in some particular order in a closed room with an open window.

Then send 2 or 3 candidates in the room and close the door.

Leave them alone and come back after 6 hours and then analyze the situation.

If they are counting the bricks.
Put them in the accounts department.

If they are recounting them..
Put them in auditing.

If they have messed up the whole place with the bricks.
Put them in engineering

If they are arranging the bricks in some strange order.
Put them in planning.

If they are throwing the bricks at each other.
Put them in operations.

If they are sleeping.
Put them in security.

If they have broken the bricks into pieces.
Put them in information technology

If they are sitting idle.
Put them in human resources.

If they say they have tried different combinations, yet not a brick has been moved.
Put them in sales.

If they have already left for the day.
Put them in marketing.

If they are staring out of the window.
Put them on strategic planning.

And then last but not least.
If they are talking to each other and not a single brick has been moved.
Congratulate them and put them in Top Management !

India Rising

Messy, raucous, democratic India is growing fast, and now may partner up with the world's richest democracy—America.

Every year at the World Economic Forum in Davos, there's a star. Not a person but a country. One country impresses the gathering of global leaders because of a particularly smart Finance minister or a compelling tale of reform or even a glamorous gala. This year there was no contest. In the decade that I've been going to Davos, no country has captured the imagination of the conference and dominated the conversation as India in 2006.

While China's rise is already here and palpable—it has grown at almost 10 percent since 1980—India's is still more a tale of the future, but a future that is coming into sharp focus. A much-cited 2003 study by Goldman Sachs projects that over the next 50 years, India will be the fastest-growing of the world's major economies (largely because its work force will not age as fast as the others). The report calculates that in 10 years India's economy will be larger than Italy's and in 15 years will have overtaken Britain's. By 2040 it will boast the world's third largest economy. By 2050 it will be five times the size of Japan's and its per capita income will have risen to 35 times its current level. Predictions like these are a treacherous business, though it's worth noting that India's current growth rate is actually higher than the study assumed.

"India is home to 40 percent of the world's poor and has the world's second largest HIV population"

Anyone who has actually been to India will probably be puzzled. "India?" he or she will say. "With its dilapidated airports, crumbling roads, vast slums and impoverished villages? We're talking about that India?" Yes, that, too, is India. The country might have several Silicon Valleys, but it also has three Nigerias within it, more than 300 million people living on less than a dollar a day. India is home to 40 percent of the world's poor and has the world's second largest HIV population. But that is the familiar India, the India of poverty and disease. The India of the future contains all this but also something new. You can feel the change even in the midst of the slums.

India's growth is messy, chaotic and largely unplanned. It is not top-down but bottom-up. It is happening not because of the government, but largely despite it. India does not have Beijing and Shanghai's gleaming infrastructure, and it does not have a government that rolls out the red carpet for foreign investment—no government in democratic India would have those kinds of powers anyway. But it has vast and growing numbers of entrepreneurs who want to make money. And somehow they find a way to do it, overcoming the obstacles, bypassing the bureaucracy. "The government sleeps at night and the economy grows," says Gurcharan Das, former CEO of Procter Gamble in India.

"The government sleeps at night and the economy grows"

There are some who argue that India's path has distinct advantages. MIT's Yasheng Huang points out that India's companies use their capital far more efficiently than China's; they benchmark to global standards and are better managed than Chinese firms. Despite being much poorer than China, India has produced dozens of world-class companies like Infosys, Ranbaxy and Reliance. Huang attributes this difference to the fact that India has a real and deep private sector (unlike China's many state-owned and state-funded companies), a clean, well-regulated financial system and the sturdy rule of law. Another example: every year Japan awards the coveted Deming Prizes for managerial innovation, and over the last four years, they have been awarded more often to Indian companies than to firms from any other country, including Japan.

The Indian state has been a roaring success on one front. India's democracy is a wonder to behold. One of the world's poorest countries, it has sustained democratic government for almost 60 years. And this is surely one of the country's greatest strengths when compared with many other developing countries. If you ask the question "What will India look like politically in 25 years?" we know the answer: like it does today—a democracy, probably with a coalition government. Democracy makes for populism, pandering and delays. But it also makes for long-term stability. (In case President Bush is looking for some answers for Iraq, he should recall that the British were able to stay in India for 200 years and built lasting institutions of government throughout the country, and that India got very lucky with its first generation of leaders. Men like Nehru may not have understood economics, but they deeply understood political freedom.)

If the Indian state has succeeded in one crucial dimension, it has failed in several others. In the 1950s and 1960s, India tried to modernize by creating a "mixed" economic model, between capitalism and communism. This meant a shackled and overregulated private sector, and a massively inefficient and corrupt public sector. The results were poor, and in the 1970s, as India became more socialist, they became disastrous. In 1960 India had a higher per capita GDP than China; today it is less than half of China's. That year it had the same per capita GDP as South Korea; today South Korea's is 13 times larger. The United Nations Human Development Index gauges countries by income, health, literacy and other such measures. India ranks 124 out of 177, behind Syria, Sri Lanka, Vietnam and the Dominican Republic. Female literacy in India is a shockingly low 54 percent. Despite mountains of rhetoric about helping the poor, by any reasonable comparison, India's government has done too little for them.

"Nearly a fifth of the members of the Indian Parliament have been accused of crimes, including embezzlement, rape and murder"

Is this a problem with democracy? Not entirely. Bad policies fail whether pursued by dictators or democrats. But there are elements of democracy that have hurt, certainly in a country with rampant poverty, feudalism and illiteracy. Democracy in India too often means not the will of the majority but the will of organized minorities—landowners, powerful castes, farmers, government unions and local thugs. (Nearly a fifth of the members of the Indian Parliament have been accused of crimes, including embezzlement, rape and murder.) These groups are usually richer than most of their countrymen, and they plunder the state's coffers to stay that way. It is ironic, for example, that India's Communist Party does not campaign for growth to lift the very poor but rather works to maintain the relatively privileged conditions of unionized workers. As these power plays go on, the great majority's interests—those 800 million who earn less than $2 a day—often fall through the cracks.

Most Americans would probably be surprised to learn that India is, by all accounts, the most pro-American country in the world. The Pew Global Attitudes Survey, released in June 2005, asked people in 16 countries whether they had a favorable impression of the United States. A stunning 71 percent of Indians said yes. Only Americans had a more favorable view of America (83 percent). The numbers are somewhat lower in other surveys, but the basic finding remains true: Indians are extremely comfortable with, and well disposed toward, America.

The real stumbling block to a deep Indo-U.S. relationship will come not from Washington but New Delhi. While Singh and some others at the top of the Indian government see the world clearly, and see the immense opportunities it opens up for India, many others are blinded by their prejudices. For many Indian elites, it has been comfortable and comforting to look at the world from the prism of a poor, Third World country, whose foreign policy was neutral, detached (and, one might add, unsuccessful). They understand how to operate in that world, whom to bargain with, whom to beg from and whom to be belligerent with. But a world in which India is a great power, in which it moves confidently across the global stage, and in which it is a friend and partner of the most powerful country in history—that is an altogether new and unsettling proposition. "Why is the United States being nice to us?" several such doubters have asked me repeatedly. Even now, in 2003, they were searching for the hidden hand. China's Mandarin class has been able to rethink its country's new role as a world power with skill and effectiveness. So far, India's Brahmins have not shown themselves the equals of their neighbor.

"Today it is India's moment. It can grasp it and forge a new path for itself"

The danger for India is that this moment might not last forever. The world turns and India will have its ups and downs. But today it is India's moment. It can grasp it and forge a new path for itself. Along that road lies a genuine and deep relationship between the planet's largest democracy and its wealthiest democracy. Until now, this has merely been a slogan. It could actually become a reality, and who knows what such a world might look like?

India: Asia's Other Superpower Breaks Out - Newsweek World News - MSNBC.com

^TOP^